Main Menu
 
 YÖRTÜRK:
    Information About Yörtürk Foundation
    Main Articles
    Campaings
    Announcements
    Tent
    Books
    Ancestorial
 Menu :
    Recommend Us
    Top 10
 
User Info
 
Welcome, Anonymous
Nickname
Password
(Register)
Membership:
Latest: mehmeta
New Today: 0
New Yesterday: 0
Overall: 56

People Online:
Visitors: 8
Members: 0
Total: 8
 
Who's Online
 
There are currently, 8 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
 
Search
 


 
Top-Ten Countries
 
Top-Ten Countries visiting Yörtürk Foundation


View Analysis
 

 

Yörtürk Magazine, Number: 47

Diyarbakir and It's Districts

Ziya GOKALP

Ziya GÖKALP

   The description of nationality isn’t a matter of discretionary, but it is scientifically to be arranged. When I’ve first arrived in Istanbul in my youth for education, I had to begin this scientific investigation: because, I noticed that there had been a misunderstanding coming from the past as “the ones who come from Blacksea region were called  Albanian and the ones who come from eastern provinces, like me, called as a Kurdish nationality”. Until that time, I had been feeling myself Turkish. But my opinion wasn’t based on a scientifical investigation. In order to find out the truth, I’ve started to research “being Turkish” and on the other hand “being Kurdish”. First of all, I’ve started from the language. In Diyarbakir city, even the native language is Turkish, every body knows a little Kurdish. The duality in the language could be explained in two ways; Diyarbakir’s Turkish was a Kurdish Turkish or Diyarbakir’s Kurdish was a Turkish Kurdish.

    My linguistic researches displayed that, Diyarbakir’s Turkish was consisting of a natural language i.e. : Azerbaijani dialect extended from Baghdat to Adana, Baku and Tebriz that is Akkoyunlu’s and Karakoyunlu’s Turkish. There isn’t any artificiality in this language. For this reason, it is not a Turkish which was distorted by Kurds. (Diyarbakir language is Azerbaijani Turkish and this situation makes the claims decay that cities were speaking Turkish with the influence of Ottoman Government. Because if this was the case, the language that was being speaked in these cities should be Ottoman dialect. )

   I noticed that Kurdish which was spoken in Diyarbakir, differed from fluent Kurdish that was spoken in villages. Although Kurdish is a relative of Persian, it differs from Persian in meaning of syntaxe. Because, although there is not such a case in Persian, the concepts of “masculinity and femaleness” in Kurdish are defined by putting a letter at the end of the word like in Arabic and in Latin languages. Thus, Kurdish is more compound and more complex compared to Turkish. Some grammatical  properties which are mentioned above can not be found in Turkish language. Therefore, the Turks couldn’t have a chance to penetrate Kurdish language. Diyarbakir people created an artificial Kurdish by adapting some of its rules to Turkish grammer. This kind of Kurdish can be named as “Turkish Kurdish”. This  significant case is the biggest evidence that Diyarbakir’s people are Turkish. Furthermore, Diyarbakir people use this language only when they speak to Kurds. Between themselves they only speak Turkish. When it is looked at the words of this artificial Kurdish, words of this Kurdish are very limited. That’s why, they fill the blanks with Turkish words. Anyway, Kurdish words that they know are restricted only with easy words like “come and go”.

    I found one more evidence in religious area which proves that Diyarbakir people are Turkish. Real inhabitants of Diyarbakir are Sunni like all Turkish people. And Kurds are Shafi’i in general. This is not special to Diyarbakir people. In the cities of eastern and southern provinces, the inhabitants speak Kurdish by distorting it and they differ from Shafi’i Kurds because of being Suni. And furthermore, there are also differences in some matters like clothing, cooking, construction and furnishing. These properties not only showed me that the people of Diyarbakır are Turkish, but I also understood that my grandfathers, who came from a Turkish region called Çermik, are Turkish originated as ethnic.

 

ARTUKLU TURCOMAN STATE

    Ancestor of Artuks Mr. Artuk is the son of Mr. Eksuk who was one of the presidents of Kayi clan. He participated to Malazgirt War when he were the president of Kayi clan. Then, Diyarbakir – Mardin – Harput and Malatya cities were given to Mr. Artuk. When pact with Byzantium had been violated, Alp Arslan charged an army in command of Mr. Artuk with conquering Anatolia. Mr. Artuk organized activities of installing Turkmens to Anatolia. Mr. Artuk who administered important top level duties within Grand Seljuklu State died in 1901 while performing Jerusalem Emirate duty. After he died, Turcoman clans, as his sons, founded South-East Anatolia Artuks Generosity. Diyarbakir –Mardin–Harput–Malatya cities had been the places where Turkmens lived the most throughout 307 years. Artuks who were sovereign to South-East as Hasankeyf, Mardin and Harput clans took the basis of Old State Principle. They used old Turkish names like Alpsagun, Kutlug and Yabgu. Artuks are the most important evidence that South-East Anatolia is a Turkmen state.

1-Diyanet Vakfı İslam Ansiklopedisi c.3 s.415 2-Ana Biritanica C.2 s.361 3-Türk Kültürüne Hizmet Vakfı Kültür Atlası c.1 s.173

 

image009.gif (13356 bytes)

BURC


Web site engine code is Copyright © 2003 by PHP-Nuke. All Rights Reserved. PHP-Nuke is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
Page Generation: 0.064 Seconds